Developing criteria for Cesarean Section using the RAND appropriateness method
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2393
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Developing criteria for Cesarean Section using the RAND appropriateness method ; volume:10 ; number:1 ; day:14 ; month:9 ; year:2010 ; pages:1-8 ; date:12.2010
BMC pregnancy and childbirth ; 10, Heft 1 (14.9.2010), 1-8, 12.2010
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Ostovar, Rahim
Rashidian, Arash
Pourreza, Abolghasem
Rashidi, Batool Hossein
Hantooshzadeh, Sedigheh
Ardebili, Hassan Eftekhar
Mahmoudi, Mahmood
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1471-2393-10-52
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016032140935
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:51 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Ostovar, Rahim
- Rashidian, Arash
- Pourreza, Abolghasem
- Rashidi, Batool Hossein
- Hantooshzadeh, Sedigheh
- Ardebili, Hassan Eftekhar
- Mahmoudi, Mahmood
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Resectable Rectal Cancer
Appropriateness criteria of FDG PET/CT in oncology
Development of appropriateness explicit criteria for cataract extraction by phacoemulsification
Prospektive Anwendung der EuroHip-Appropriateness Criteria zur Prothesenimplantation bei Coxarthrose
Assessment of the appropriateness of cardiovascular preventive medication in older people: using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method
American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria®: a bibliometric analysis of panel members
Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique
Response to: American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria®: A bibliometric analysis of panel members
Upper GI series in infants and children with vomiting: insights into ACR appropriateness criteria
The management of heart failure cardiogenic shock: an international RAND appropriateness panel
Appropriateness of colonoscopies in a Tunisian endoscopy center: factors and EPAGE-I/II criteria comparison
Developing repairability criteria for energy related products
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Resectable Rectal Cancer
Appropriateness criteria of FDG PET/CT in oncology
Development of appropriateness explicit criteria for cataract extraction by phacoemulsification
Prospektive Anwendung der EuroHip-Appropriateness Criteria zur Prothesenimplantation bei Coxarthrose
Assessment of the appropriateness of cardiovascular preventive medication in older people: using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method
American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria®: a bibliometric analysis of panel members
Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique
Response to: American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria®: A bibliometric analysis of panel members
Upper GI series in infants and children with vomiting: insights into ACR appropriateness criteria
The management of heart failure cardiogenic shock: an international RAND appropriateness panel
Appropriateness of colonoscopies in a Tunisian endoscopy center: factors and EPAGE-I/II criteria comparison
Developing repairability criteria for energy related products
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Resectable Rectal Cancer
Appropriateness criteria of FDG PET/CT in oncology
Development of appropriateness explicit criteria for cataract extraction by phacoemulsification
Prospektive Anwendung der EuroHip-Appropriateness Criteria zur Prothesenimplantation bei Coxarthrose
Assessment of the appropriateness of cardiovascular preventive medication in older people: using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method
American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria®: a bibliometric analysis of panel members
Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique
Response to: American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria®: A bibliometric analysis of panel members
Upper GI series in infants and children with vomiting: insights into ACR appropriateness criteria
The management of heart failure cardiogenic shock: an international RAND appropriateness panel
Appropriateness of colonoscopies in a Tunisian endoscopy center: factors and EPAGE-I/II criteria comparison