Using re-randomisation designs to increase the efficiency and applicability of retention studies within trials: a case study
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource, 1 online resource.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Using re-randomisation designs to increase the efficiency and applicability of retention studies within trials: a case study ; volume:24 ; number:1 ; day:29 ; month:4 ; year:2023 ; pages:1-8 ; date:12.2023
Trials ; 24, Heft 1 (29.4.2023), 1-8, 12.2023
- Creator
-
Goulao, Beatriz
Duncan, Anne
Innes, Karen
Ramsay, Craig R.
Kahan, Brennan C.
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13063-023-07323-y
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2023090510382055779975
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 11:01 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Goulao, Beatriz
- Duncan, Anne
- Innes, Karen
- Ramsay, Craig R.
- Kahan, Brennan C.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Seven myths of randomisation in clinical trials
A re-randomisation design for clinical trials
Rapid centralised randomisation in emergency setting trials using a smartphone
Use of randomisation in clinical trials: a survey of UK practice
The use of randomisation-based efficacy estimators in non-inferiority trials
Choosing and evaluating randomisation methods in clinical trials: a qualitative study
Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability
Independence estimators for re-randomisation trials in multi-episode settings: a simulation study
Leisure sedentary behaviour increases the risk of venous thromboembolism: a Mendelian randomisation study
Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
Placebo-controlled clinical trials: how trial documents justify the use of randomisation and placebo
Recruitment and retention in internet based randomised trials
Seven myths of randomisation in clinical trials
A re-randomisation design for clinical trials
Rapid centralised randomisation in emergency setting trials using a smartphone
Use of randomisation in clinical trials: a survey of UK practice
The use of randomisation-based efficacy estimators in non-inferiority trials
Choosing and evaluating randomisation methods in clinical trials: a qualitative study
Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability
Independence estimators for re-randomisation trials in multi-episode settings: a simulation study
Leisure sedentary behaviour increases the risk of venous thromboembolism: a Mendelian randomisation study
Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
Placebo-controlled clinical trials: how trial documents justify the use of randomisation and placebo
Recruitment and retention in internet based randomised trials
Seven myths of randomisation in clinical trials
A re-randomisation design for clinical trials
Rapid centralised randomisation in emergency setting trials using a smartphone
Use of randomisation in clinical trials: a survey of UK practice
The use of randomisation-based efficacy estimators in non-inferiority trials
Choosing and evaluating randomisation methods in clinical trials: a qualitative study
Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability
Independence estimators for re-randomisation trials in multi-episode settings: a simulation study
Leisure sedentary behaviour increases the risk of venous thromboembolism: a Mendelian randomisation study
Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
Placebo-controlled clinical trials: how trial documents justify the use of randomisation and placebo