Correction to: Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1745-6215
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Correction to: Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators ; volume:21 ; number:1 ; day:8 ; month:10 ; year:2020 ; pages:1-4 ; date:12.2020
Trials ; 21, Heft 1 (8.10.2020), 1-4, 12.2020
- Creator
-
Sheridan, Rebecca
Martin-Kerry, Jacqueline
Hudson, Joanna
Parker, Adwoa
Bower, Peter
Knapp, Peter
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13063-020-04793-2
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2020112320052739917737
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:26 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Sheridan, Rebecca
- Martin-Kerry, Jacqueline
- Hudson, Joanna
- Parker, Adwoa
- Bower, Peter
- Knapp, Peter
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators
Better management of multimorbidity: a critical look at the ‘Ariadne principles’
Can the feedback of patient assessments, brief training, or their combination, improve the interpersonal skills of primary care physicians? A systematic review
Can a ‘consent to contact’ community help research teams overcome barriers to recruitment? The development and impact of the ‘Research for the Future’ community
Factors affecting recruitment into depression trials: systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence
Improving recruitment to a study of telehealth management for long-term conditions in primary care: two embedded, randomised controlled trials of optimised patient information materials
Exercise in the treatment of clinical anxiety in general practice – a systematic review and meta-analysis
The General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) – Development and psychometric characteristics
Doing trials within trials: a qualitative study of stakeholder views on barriers and facilitators to the routine adoption of methodology research in clinical trials
What are the core predictors of ‘hassles’ among patients with multimorbidity in primary care? A cross sectional study
Improving recruitment to a study of telehealth management for COPD: a cluster randomised controlled ‘study within a trial’ (SWAT) of a multimedia information resource
Understanding the diagnosis of pre-diabetes in patients aged over 85 in English primary care: a qualitative study
Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators
Better management of multimorbidity: a critical look at the ‘Ariadne principles’
Can the feedback of patient assessments, brief training, or their combination, improve the interpersonal skills of primary care physicians? A systematic review
Can a ‘consent to contact’ community help research teams overcome barriers to recruitment? The development and impact of the ‘Research for the Future’ community
Factors affecting recruitment into depression trials: systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence
Improving recruitment to a study of telehealth management for long-term conditions in primary care: two embedded, randomised controlled trials of optimised patient information materials
Exercise in the treatment of clinical anxiety in general practice – a systematic review and meta-analysis
The General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) – Development and psychometric characteristics
Doing trials within trials: a qualitative study of stakeholder views on barriers and facilitators to the routine adoption of methodology research in clinical trials
What are the core predictors of ‘hassles’ among patients with multimorbidity in primary care? A cross sectional study
Improving recruitment to a study of telehealth management for COPD: a cluster randomised controlled ‘study within a trial’ (SWAT) of a multimedia information resource
Understanding the diagnosis of pre-diabetes in patients aged over 85 in English primary care: a qualitative study
Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators
Better management of multimorbidity: a critical look at the ‘Ariadne principles’
Can the feedback of patient assessments, brief training, or their combination, improve the interpersonal skills of primary care physicians? A systematic review
Can a ‘consent to contact’ community help research teams overcome barriers to recruitment? The development and impact of the ‘Research for the Future’ community
Factors affecting recruitment into depression trials: systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence
Improving recruitment to a study of telehealth management for long-term conditions in primary care: two embedded, randomised controlled trials of optimised patient information materials
Exercise in the treatment of clinical anxiety in general practice – a systematic review and meta-analysis
The General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) – Development and psychometric characteristics
Doing trials within trials: a qualitative study of stakeholder views on barriers and facilitators to the routine adoption of methodology research in clinical trials
What are the core predictors of ‘hassles’ among patients with multimorbidity in primary care? A cross sectional study
Improving recruitment to a study of telehealth management for COPD: a cluster randomised controlled ‘study within a trial’ (SWAT) of a multimedia information resource