“Expression of concern”: publication bias for positive preclinical cardioprotection studies
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
1 Online-Ressource.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
“Expression of concern”: publication bias for positive preclinical cardioprotection studies ; volume:119 ; number:3 ; day:26 ; month:4 ; year:2024 ; pages:397-402 ; date:6.2024
Basic research in cardiology ; 119, Heft 3 (26.4.2024), 397-402, 6.2024
- Urheber
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1007/s00395-024-01050-4
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2408082113371.609550242520
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:47 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Skyschally, Andreas
- Kleinbongard, Petra
- Neuhäuser, Markus
- Heusch, Gerd
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Publication Bias
Algorithmic Political Bias—an Entrenchment Concern
Publication bias in situ
Practical guidelines for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical and clinical studies on cardioprotection
Mitophagy for cardioprotection
CAESAR’s legacy: a new era of rigor in preclinical studies of cardioprotection
Publication bias in measuring intertemporal substitution
Unpacking P-Hacking and Publication Bias
Publication bias in measuring climate sensitivity
Unpacking P-Hacking and Publication Bias
IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria: guidelines of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action
Is translational research compatible with preclinical publication strategies?
Publication Bias
Algorithmic Political Bias—an Entrenchment Concern
Publication bias in situ
Practical guidelines for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical and clinical studies on cardioprotection
Mitophagy for cardioprotection
CAESAR’s legacy: a new era of rigor in preclinical studies of cardioprotection
Publication bias in measuring intertemporal substitution
Unpacking P-Hacking and Publication Bias
Publication bias in measuring climate sensitivity
Unpacking P-Hacking and Publication Bias
IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria: guidelines of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action
Is translational research compatible with preclinical publication strategies?
Publication Bias
Algorithmic Political Bias—an Entrenchment Concern
Publication bias in situ
Practical guidelines for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical and clinical studies on cardioprotection
Mitophagy for cardioprotection
CAESAR’s legacy: a new era of rigor in preclinical studies of cardioprotection
Publication bias in measuring intertemporal substitution
Unpacking P-Hacking and Publication Bias
Publication bias in measuring climate sensitivity
Unpacking P-Hacking and Publication Bias
IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria: guidelines of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action