Learning and satisfaction in webinar, online, and face-to-face instruction: a meta-analysis
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
In: Frontiers in Education, 4, S. 92-
- Classification
-
Erziehung, Schul- und Bildungswesen
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (where)
-
Augsburg
- (who)
-
Universität Augsburg, Frontiers Media SA
- (when)
-
2019
- Creator
- DOI
-
10.3389/feduc.2019.00092
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-865656
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
25.03.2025, 1:54 PM CET
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Ebner, Christian
- Gegenfurtner, Andreas
- Universität Augsburg, Frontiers Media SA
Time of origin
- 2019
Other Objects (12)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
Interviewer-related measurement error in face-to-face surveys
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
Interviewer-related measurement error in face-to-face surveys
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings