Understanding determinants of patients’ decisions to attend their family physician and to take antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections: a qualitative descriptive study
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2296
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Understanding determinants of patients’ decisions to attend their family physician and to take antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections: a qualitative descriptive study ; volume:21 ; number:1 ; day:24 ; month:6 ; year:2020 ; pages:1-11 ; date:12.2020
BMC family practice ; 21, Heft 1 (24.6.2020), 1-11, 12.2020
- Urheber
-
Mortazhejri, Sameh
Patey, Andrea M.
Stacey, Dawn
Bhatia, R. Sacha
Abdulla, Alykhan
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12875-020-01196-9
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2020082021385136525745
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:50 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Mortazhejri, Sameh
- Patey, Andrea M.
- Stacey, Dawn
- Bhatia, R. Sacha
- Abdulla, Alykhan
- Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Systematic review of patient-oriented interventions to reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections
Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review
Anesthesiologists’ and surgeons’ perceptions about routine pre-operative testing in low-risk patients: application of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify factors that influence physicians’ decisions to order pre-operative tests
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Systematic review of patient-oriented interventions to reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections
Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review
Anesthesiologists’ and surgeons’ perceptions about routine pre-operative testing in low-risk patients: application of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify factors that influence physicians’ decisions to order pre-operative tests
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Systematic review of patient-oriented interventions to reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections
Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review