Methane emissions responsible for record-breaking atmospheric methane growth rates in 2020 and 2021

to related objects

Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main

Extent: Online-Ressource

Language: Englisch

Bibliographic citation: Methane emissions responsible for record-breaking atmospheric methane growth rates in 2020 and 2021 ; day:17 ; month:06 ; year:2022 ; pages:1-23 ; extent:23
Atmospheric chemistry and physics / Discussions. Discussions ; (17.06.2022), 1-23 (gesamt 23)

Creator: Feng, Liang
Palmer, Paul
Parker, Robert J.
Lunt, Mark F.
Boesch, Hartmut

DOI: 10.5194/acp-2022-425

URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022062305232130084341

Rights: Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.

Last update: 15.08.2025, 7:30 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Show original at data provider

Associated

Feng, Liang
Palmer, Paul
Parker, Robert J.
Lunt, Mark F.
Boesch, Hartmut

Other Objects (12)

Methane emissions are predominantly responsible for record-breaking atmospheric methane growth rates in 2020 and 2021

Simulations of atmospheric methane for Cape Grim, Tasmania, to constrain southeastern Australian methane emissions

Estimating emissions of methane consistent with atmospheric measurements of methane and δ13C of methane

Estimating emissions of methane consistent with atmospheric measurements of methane and <italic>δ</italic>13C of methane

Estimating Emissions of Methane Consistent with Atmospheric Measurements of Methane and δ13C of Methane

ATMOSPHERIC METHANE EMISSIONS FOR ARGENTINA. COMPARISON WITH TROPOMI SATELLITE MEASUREMENTS

Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane

$Methane emissions from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf inferred from accurate observations of atmospheric methane mole fractions$

Methane emissions from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf inferred from accurate observations of atmospheric methane mole fractions

Atmospheric constraints on the methane emissions from the East Siberian Shelf

Wetland hydrological dynamics and methane emissions

Enteric methane emissions from German pigs

Global trend of methane abatement inventions and widening mismatch with methane emissions

Methane emissions are predominantly responsible for record-breaking atmospheric methane growth rates in 2020 and 2021

Simulations of atmospheric methane for Cape Grim, Tasmania, to constrain southeastern Australian methane emissions

Estimating emissions of methane consistent with atmospheric measurements of methane and <italic>δ</italic>13C of methane

Estimating Emissions of Methane Consistent with Atmospheric Measurements of Methane and δ13C of Methane

ATMOSPHERIC METHANE EMISSIONS FOR ARGENTINA. COMPARISON WITH TROPOMI SATELLITE MEASUREMENTS

Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane

$Methane emissions from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf inferred from accurate observations of atmospheric methane mole fractions$

Methane emissions from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf inferred from accurate observations of atmospheric methane mole fractions

Atmospheric constraints on the methane emissions from the East Siberian Shelf

Wetland hydrological dynamics and methane emissions

Enteric methane emissions from German pigs

Global trend of methane abatement inventions and widening mismatch with methane emissions

Methane emissions are predominantly responsible for record-breaking atmospheric methane growth rates in 2020 and 2021

Simulations of atmospheric methane for Cape Grim, Tasmania, to constrain southeastern Australian methane emissions

Estimating emissions of methane consistent with atmospheric measurements of methane and <italic>δ</italic>13C of methane

Estimating Emissions of Methane Consistent with Atmospheric Measurements of Methane and δ13C of Methane

ATMOSPHERIC METHANE EMISSIONS FOR ARGENTINA. COMPARISON WITH TROPOMI SATELLITE MEASUREMENTS

Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane

$Methane emissions from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf inferred from accurate observations of atmospheric methane mole fractions$

Methane emissions from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf inferred from accurate observations of atmospheric methane mole fractions

Atmospheric constraints on the methane emissions from the East Siberian Shelf

Wetland hydrological dynamics and methane emissions

Enteric methane emissions from German pigs

Global trend of methane abatement inventions and widening mismatch with methane emissions

Cultural heritage institutions wishing to register will find more information here.

Fields marked * need to be filled in.

Username*

Please enter your username

Email*

Please enter your email address

Please do not fill this field

First name

Last name

Password*

Please enter your password

Confirm password*

Please enter the same password

I have read the terms of use and the privacy policy for the collection of personal data and accept them. *

This field is required.

I would like to subscribe to the newsletter of the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek. See newsletter subscription info.

Account created

Your "My DDB" account has been successfully created. Before you can log in to your account, you must click the confirmation link in the message we just sent to the email address you provided.

Methane emissions responsible for record-breaking atmospheric methane growth rates in 2020 and 2021

Object Details

References and Relationships

Contributors, Places and Time

Further information

Data provider

Associated

Other Objects (12)

Methane emissions are predominantly responsible for record-breaking atmospheric methane growth rates in 2020 and 2021

Simulations of atmospheric methane for Cape Grim, Tasmania, to constrain southeastern Australian methane emissions

Estimating emissions of methane consistent with atmospheric measurements of methane and <italic>δ</italic><sup>13</sup>C of methane

Estimating Emissions of Methane Consistent with Atmospheric Measurements of Methane and <em>&delta;</em><sup>13</sup>C of Methane

ATMOSPHERIC METHANE EMISSIONS FOR ARGENTINA. COMPARISON WITH TROPOMI SATELLITE MEASUREMENTS

Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane

Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane

Methane emissions from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf inferred from accurate observations of atmospheric methane mole fractions

Atmospheric constraints on the methane emissions from the East Siberian Shelf

Wetland hydrological dynamics and methane emissions

Enteric methane emissions from German pigs

Global trend of methane abatement inventions and widening mismatch with methane emissions

Methane emissions are predominantly responsible for record-breaking atmospheric methane growth rates in 2020 and 2021

Simulations of atmospheric methane for Cape Grim, Tasmania, to constrain southeastern Australian methane emissions

Estimating emissions of methane consistent with atmospheric measurements of methane and <italic>δ</italic><sup>13</sup>C of methane

Estimating Emissions of Methane Consistent with Atmospheric Measurements of Methane and <em>&delta;</em><sup>13</sup>C of Methane

ATMOSPHERIC METHANE EMISSIONS FOR ARGENTINA. COMPARISON WITH TROPOMI SATELLITE MEASUREMENTS

Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane

Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane

Methane emissions from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf inferred from accurate observations of atmospheric methane mole fractions

Atmospheric constraints on the methane emissions from the East Siberian Shelf

Wetland hydrological dynamics and methane emissions

Enteric methane emissions from German pigs

Global trend of methane abatement inventions and widening mismatch with methane emissions

Methane emissions are predominantly responsible for record-breaking atmospheric methane growth rates in 2020 and 2021

Simulations of atmospheric methane for Cape Grim, Tasmania, to constrain southeastern Australian methane emissions

Estimating emissions of methane consistent with atmospheric measurements of methane and <italic>δ</italic><sup>13</sup>C of methane

Estimating Emissions of Methane Consistent with Atmospheric Measurements of Methane and <em>&delta;</em><sup>13</sup>C of Methane

ATMOSPHERIC METHANE EMISSIONS FOR ARGENTINA. COMPARISON WITH TROPOMI SATELLITE MEASUREMENTS

Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane

Quantifying methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources using satellite observations of atmospheric methane

Methane emissions from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf inferred from accurate observations of atmospheric methane mole fractions

Atmospheric constraints on the methane emissions from the East Siberian Shelf

Wetland hydrological dynamics and methane emissions

Enteric methane emissions from German pigs

Global trend of methane abatement inventions and widening mismatch with methane emissions

Related objects

Reset password

Estimating Emissions of Methane Consistent with Atmospheric Measurements of Methane and <em>δ</em><sup>13</sup>C of Methane

Estimating Emissions of Methane Consistent with Atmospheric Measurements of Methane and <em>δ</em><sup>13</sup>C of Methane

Estimating Emissions of Methane Consistent with Atmospheric Measurements of Methane and <em>δ</em><sup>13</sup>C of Methane