- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2458
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Australian health care providers’ views on opt-out HIV testing ; volume:15 ; number:1 ; day:14 ; month:9 ; year:2015 ; pages:1-9 ; date:12.2015
BMC public health ; 15, Heft 1 (14.9.2015), 1-9, 12.2015
- Urheber
-
Leidel, Stacy
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
McConigley, Ruth
Boldy, Duncan
Wilson, Sally
Girdler, Sonya
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12889-015-2229-9
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016121524411
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:47 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Leidel, Stacy
- McConigley, Ruth
- Boldy, Duncan
- Wilson, Sally
- Girdler, Sonya
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Opt-in vs. Opt-out = opt-in-opt-out? : On the activation of the ICC's jurisdiction over the crime of aggression
Opt in versus opt out: a free-entry analysis of privacy policies
The opt-out revolution: A descriptive analysis
The opt-out revolution: a descriptive analysis
Citizen Views on an Opt-Out Approach to National Electronic Health Records in Germany: A Small-Scale Qualitative Study
Opt Out of Online Sexism – Open Source Activism
Difficult conversations: Australian Indigenous patients’ views on kidney transplantation
Gambling treatment service providers’ views about contingency management: a thematic analysis
Participant recruitment in sensitive surveys: a comparative trial of ‘opt in’ versus ‘opt out’ approaches
Risk Selection under Public Health Insurance with Opt-out
Q&A: Re-review opt-out and painless publishing
Australian teachers’ views on how primary science education can be improved
Opt-in vs. Opt-out = opt-in-opt-out? : On the activation of the ICC's jurisdiction over the crime of aggression
Opt in versus opt out: a free-entry analysis of privacy policies
The opt-out revolution: A descriptive analysis
The opt-out revolution: a descriptive analysis
Citizen Views on an Opt-Out Approach to National Electronic Health Records in Germany: A Small-Scale Qualitative Study
Opt Out of Online Sexism – Open Source Activism
Difficult conversations: Australian Indigenous patients’ views on kidney transplantation
Gambling treatment service providers’ views about contingency management: a thematic analysis
Participant recruitment in sensitive surveys: a comparative trial of ‘opt in’ versus ‘opt out’ approaches
Risk Selection under Public Health Insurance with Opt-out
Q&A: Re-review opt-out and painless publishing
Australian teachers’ views on how primary science education can be improved
Opt-in vs. Opt-out = opt-in-opt-out? : On the activation of the ICC's jurisdiction over the crime of aggression
Opt in versus opt out: a free-entry analysis of privacy policies
The opt-out revolution: A descriptive analysis
The opt-out revolution: a descriptive analysis
Citizen Views on an Opt-Out Approach to National Electronic Health Records in Germany: A Small-Scale Qualitative Study
Opt Out of Online Sexism – Open Source Activism
Difficult conversations: Australian Indigenous patients’ views on kidney transplantation
Gambling treatment service providers’ views about contingency management: a thematic analysis
Participant recruitment in sensitive surveys: a comparative trial of ‘opt in’ versus ‘opt out’ approaches
Risk Selection under Public Health Insurance with Opt-out
Q&A: Re-review opt-out and painless publishing