Identifying indicators of systemic risk

Arbeitspapier

We operationalize the definition of systemic risk provided by the IMF, BIS, and FSB and derive testable hypotheses to identify indicators of systemic risk. We map these hypotheses into a two-stage hierarchical testing framework, combining insights from the early-warning literature on financial crises with recent advances on growth-at-risk. Applying this framework to a set of candidate variables, we find that the Basel III credit-to-GDP gap does not indicate systemic risk coherently across G7 countries. Credit growth and house price growth also do not pass our test in many cases. By contrast, a composite financial cycle signals systemic risk consistently for all countries except Canada. Overall, our results suggest that systemic risk may be consistently measured only once the turning points of indicators have been observed. Therefore, pre-emptive countercyclical macroprudential policy may smooth the financial cycle in boom phases, which then indirectly mitigates the amount of systemic risk in the future.

Angaben zum Objekt

• ISBN: 978-3-95729-725-9
• Sprache: Englisch

Verweise und Beziehungen

• Erschienen in: Series: Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper ; No. 33/2020

Klassifikation und Themen

• Klassifikation: Wirtschaft ; Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles: Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications ; Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy ; Financial Forecasting and Simulation
• Thema: systemic risk ; macroprudential regulation ; forecasting ; growth-at-risk ; financial cycles

Beteiligte, Orts- und Zeitangaben

• Ereignis: Geistige Schöpfung
• (wer): Hartwig, Benny ; Meinerding, Christoph ; Schüler, Yves
• Ereignis: Veröffentlichung
• (wer): Deutsche Bundesbank
• (wo): Frankfurt a. M.
• (wann): 2020

Weitere Informationen

• Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/221736
• Letzte Aktualisierung: 10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ