The rich in public opinion : what we think when we think about wealth
Zusammenfassung: "What do people in the United States and Europe think about the rich? There are several thousand books and articles on stereotypes and prejudices directed at minorities, women, the people of other nations, and even the poor. In contrast, there has only been sporadic research into stereotypes about the rich and no comprehensive, scientific study on this topic has yet been published-until now. What We Think When We Think about Wealth examines attitudes about wealth and the wealthy in four industrialized western countries: The United States, Great Britain, Germany, and France. Consisting of three parts, this book surveys the literature about stereotypes and prejudices; reports on original survey data, which used identical questions to survey residents of four countries regarding various aspects of their attitudes toward wealth; and examines the important role the media plays in forming opinions on wealth and the rich. This book aims to examine how we think about a minority that, while undeniably powerful, can still be the subject of negative stereotypes, prejudice, and scapegoating-often with dire effects for us all"--(Provided by publisher.)
- Weitere Titel
-
Gesellschaft und ihre Reichen
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISBN
-
9781948647670
1948647672
- Maße
-
24 cm
- Umfang
-
xv, 463 Seiten
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Diagramme
- Schlagwort
-
Reichtum
Soziale Klasse
Öffentliche Meinung
Vorurteil
Neid
Fremdgruppe
Reichtum
Massenmedien
Europa
USA
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Washington, DC
- (wer)
-
Cato Institute
- (wann)
-
[2020]
- Urheber
- Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Rechteinformation
-
Bei diesem Objekt liegt nur das Inhaltsverzeichnis digital vor. Der Zugriff darauf ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
11.06.2025, 13:43 MESZ
Datenpartner
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Zitelmann, Rainer
- Cato Institute
Entstanden
- [2020]
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
What we think.
Spoofing GPS is it really the time we think it is, and are we really where we think we are?
Who are the trustworthy, we think?
Who are the trustworthy, we think?
Sometimes We Sit And Think and Sometimes We Just Sit
How Should We Think About Employers' Associations?
Rule of Law Rules #6 : “When We Think about the Future, We Have to Think About Data Participation”
Do we know what we think we know? Aid fragmentation and effectiveness revisited
Our individual order of things directs how we think we feel
Should history change the way we think about populism?
Open ecological questions that we can answer when we think carefully about stochasticity
Subprime facts: What (we think) we know about the subprime crisis and what we don't
What we think.
Spoofing GPS is it really the time we think it is, and are we really where we think we are?
Who are the trustworthy, we think?
Who are the trustworthy, we think?
Sometimes We Sit And Think and Sometimes We Just Sit
How Should We Think About Employers' Associations?
Rule of Law Rules #6 : “When We Think about the Future, We Have to Think About Data Participation”
Do we know what we think we know? Aid fragmentation and effectiveness revisited
Our individual order of things directs how we think we feel
Should history change the way we think about populism?
Open ecological questions that we can answer when we think carefully about stochasticity
Subprime facts: What (we think) we know about the subprime crisis and what we don't
What we think.
Spoofing GPS is it really the time we think it is, and are we really where we think we are?
Who are the trustworthy, we think?
Who are the trustworthy, we think?
Sometimes We Sit And Think and Sometimes We Just Sit
How Should We Think About Employers' Associations?
Rule of Law Rules #6 : “When We Think about the Future, We Have to Think About Data Participation”
Do we know what we think we know? Aid fragmentation and effectiveness revisited
Our individual order of things directs how we think we feel
Should history change the way we think about populism?
Open ecological questions that we can answer when we think carefully about stochasticity