Deep brain stimulation for neurological disorders: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of randomised clinical trials
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Deep brain stimulation for neurological disorders: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of randomised clinical trials ; volume:11 ; number:1 ; day:13 ; month:10 ; year:2022 ; pages:1-13 ; date:12.2022
Systematic Reviews ; 11, Heft 1 (13.10.2022), 1-13, 12.2022
- Creator
-
Petersen, Johanne Juul
Juul, Sophie
Jørgensen, Caroline Kamp
Gluud, Christian
Jakobsen, Janus Christian
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13643-022-02095-z
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022123021062415679835
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:30 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Petersen, Johanne Juul
- Juul, Sophie
- Jørgensen, Caroline Kamp
- Gluud, Christian
- Jakobsen, Janus Christian
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis
Exercise for patients with major depression: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
Major mistakes and errors in the use of Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews or meta-analyses – protocol for a systematic review
Using Trial Sequential Analysis for estimating the sample sizes of further trials: example using smoking cessation intervention
Assessing imprecision in Cochrane systematic reviews: a comparison of GRADE and Trial Sequential Analysis
Milrinone for cardiac dysfunction in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
DEBATE-statistical analysis plans for observational studies
Digoxin versus placebo, no intervention, or other medical interventions for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
The effects of rhythm control strategies versus rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
Carotid artery stenting versus no stenting assisting thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke: protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
Likely country of origin in publications on randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials during the last 60 years
Antibiotic regimens for neonatal sepsis - a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis
Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis
Exercise for patients with major depression: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
Major mistakes and errors in the use of Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews or meta-analyses – protocol for a systematic review
Using Trial Sequential Analysis for estimating the sample sizes of further trials: example using smoking cessation intervention
Assessing imprecision in Cochrane systematic reviews: a comparison of GRADE and Trial Sequential Analysis
Milrinone for cardiac dysfunction in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
DEBATE-statistical analysis plans for observational studies
Digoxin versus placebo, no intervention, or other medical interventions for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
The effects of rhythm control strategies versus rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
Carotid artery stenting versus no stenting assisting thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke: protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
Likely country of origin in publications on randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials during the last 60 years
Antibiotic regimens for neonatal sepsis - a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis
Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis
Exercise for patients with major depression: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
Major mistakes and errors in the use of Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews or meta-analyses – protocol for a systematic review
Using Trial Sequential Analysis for estimating the sample sizes of further trials: example using smoking cessation intervention
Assessing imprecision in Cochrane systematic reviews: a comparison of GRADE and Trial Sequential Analysis
Milrinone for cardiac dysfunction in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
DEBATE-statistical analysis plans for observational studies
Digoxin versus placebo, no intervention, or other medical interventions for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
The effects of rhythm control strategies versus rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
Carotid artery stenting versus no stenting assisting thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke: protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
Likely country of origin in publications on randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials during the last 60 years