Arbeitspapier

Are Program Participants Good Evaluators?

How well do program participants assess program performance ex-post? In this paper we compare participant evaluations based on survey responses to econometric impact estimates obtained using data from the experimental evaluation of the U.S. Job Training Partnership Act. We have two main findings: First, the participant evaluations are unrelated to the econometric impact estimates. Second, the participant evaluations do covary with impact proxies such as service intensity, outcome levels, and before-after outcome differences. Our results suggest that program participants behave as 'lay scientists' who seek to estimate the impact of the program but face cognitive challenges in doing so.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: IZA Discussion Papers ; No. 13584

Classification
Wirtschaft
Education: Government Policy
Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
Subject
program evaluation
participant evaluation
surveys

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Smith, Jeffrey A.
Whalley, Alexander
Wilcox, Nathaniel T.
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)
(where)
Bonn
(when)
2020

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Smith, Jeffrey A.
  • Whalley, Alexander
  • Wilcox, Nathaniel T.
  • Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)

Time of origin

  • 2020

Other Objects (12)