Arbeitspapier

Are Program Participants Good Evaluators?

How well do program participants assess program performance ex-post? In this paper we compare participant evaluations based on survey responses to econometric impact estimates obtained using data from the experimental evaluation of the U.S. Job Training Partnership Act. We have two main findings: First, the participant evaluations are unrelated to the econometric impact estimates. Second, the participant evaluations do covary with impact proxies such as service intensity, outcome levels, and before-after outcome differences. Our results suggest that program participants behave as 'lay scientists' who seek to estimate the impact of the program but face cognitive challenges in doing so.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: IZA Discussion Papers ; No. 13584

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Education: Government Policy
Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
Thema
program evaluation
participant evaluation
surveys

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Smith, Jeffrey A.
Whalley, Alexander
Wilcox, Nathaniel T.
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)
(wo)
Bonn
(wann)
2020

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:43 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Smith, Jeffrey A.
  • Whalley, Alexander
  • Wilcox, Nathaniel T.
  • Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)

Entstanden

  • 2020

Ähnliche Objekte (12)