Arbeitspapier

Bargaining with Non-Monolithic Players

This paper analyses strategic bargaining in negotiations between non-monolithic players, i.e. agents starting negotiations can split up in smaller entities during the bargaining process. We show that the possibility of scission in the informed coalition implies that it loses its information advantages. We also show that when the possibility of a scission exists the uninformed player does not focus on his or her beliefs about the strength of the informed coalition but on the proportion of weak/strong players within this coalition. Finally, our results show that the possibility of a scission reduces the incentives for the leader to propose a high offer to ensure a global agreement. We apply this framework to international negotiations on global public goods and to wage negotiations.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: Nota di Lavoro ; No. 95.2005

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Noncooperative Games
Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
Renewable Resources and Conservation: Government Policy
Thema
Strategic bargaining
Non-monolithic players
Scission
Noncooperative game-theory
Verhandlungstheorie
Nichtkooperatives Spiel
Theorie

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Pereau, Jean Christophe
Caparrós, Alejandro
Tazdaït, Tarik
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM)
(wo)
Milano
(wann)
2005

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:45 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Pereau, Jean Christophe
  • Caparrós, Alejandro
  • Tazdaït, Tarik
  • Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM)

Entstanden

  • 2005

Ähnliche Objekte (12)