Constructing the history of risk: foundations, tools, and reasons why

Abstract: The risk of accidents and disasters has always been central to the human experience. Yet, historians have only recently begun to consider risk as distinct category of historical analysis. Instead, the study of risk has been fragmented into a series of rubrics, including: risk society, modernity, history of safety, and disaster studies. This article calls for a more analytically coherent approach to risk in history, which integrates theoretical tools developed by social theorists and contemporary sociologists, with the historian’s attention to change over time, historical contingency, and individual agency. Borrowing from the work of historians of technology and material culture scholars, this approach also pays particular attention to how the material dimensions of risk entwine with politics and culture. The article also offers an overview of the existing literature and suggestions for areas of future research. (author's abstract)

Angaben zum Objekt

• Weitere Titel: Risikogeschichte: wie, warum und zu welchem Ende schreiben wir eine Geschichte des Risikos?
• Standort: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
• Umfang: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: Englisch

Verweise und Beziehungen

• Erschienen in: Constructing the history of risk: foundations, tools, and reasons why ; volume:41 ; number:1 ; year:2016 ; pages:30-47 ; Veröffentlichungsversion ; begutachtet (peer reviewed) ; Historical social research ; 41, Heft 1 (2016), 30-47

Klassifikation und Themen

• Klassifikation: Geschichte

Beteiligte, Orts- und Zeitangaben

• Urheber: Mohun, Arwen P.

Weitere Informationen

• DOI: 10.12759/hsr.41.2016.1.30-47
• URN: urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-46552-2
• Rechteinformation: Open Access; Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
• Letzte Aktualisierung: 14.08.2025, 10:53 MESZ