Arbeitspapier | Working paper
Pluralism in Economics: Inquiries into a Daedalean Concept
The state of contemporary economics had been a subject of discussion even before the most recent global financial crisis. The one-sidedness of the discipline has frequently been lamented and calls are often made for its pluralisation. Nevertheless, there is neither a consensus over the form of pluralism that is required (whether this is a theory, method, or paradigm pluralism, for example), nor agreement among economists over the underlying diagnosis of a lack of pluralism. Even the justification for this pluralistic norm - i.e. whether it should be seen in terms of an ethics of fairness and tolerance or as the imperative of academic freedom - remains disputed and is often unclear. The present paper aims to shed some light on these ambiguities.
- ISSN
-
1868-4947
- Umfang
-
Seite(n): 32
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Status: Veröffentlichungsversion
- Erschienen in
-
ZÖSS Discussion Paper (51)
- Thema
-
Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie
Wirtschaft
Wissenschaftstheorie, Wissenschaftsphilosophie, Wissenschaftslogik, Ethik der Sozialwissenschaften
Volkswirtschaftstheorie
Pluralismus
Wissenschaft
Philosophie
Wirtschaftswissenschaft
Theorie
Methode
Paradigma
Ethik
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Heise, Arne
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Universität Hamburg, Fak. Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, FB Sozialökonomie, Zentrum für Ökonomische und Soziologische Studien (ZÖSS)
- (wo)
-
Deutschland, Hamburg
- (wann)
-
2016
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-59885-6
- Rechteinformation
-
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
21.06.2024, 16:27 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Heise, Arne
- Universität Hamburg, Fak. Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, FB Sozialökonomie, Zentrum für Ökonomische und Soziologische Studien (ZÖSS)
Entstanden
- 2016
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Pluralism in economics: Inquiries into a Daedalean concept
Comparing economic theories or: Pluralism in economics and the need for a comparative approach to scientific research programmes
Ideology and pluralism: A German view
Ideology and Pluralism in Economics: a German View
Editorial: Einführung in das Schwerpunktheft, Wirtschaftswissenschaft (en) – Quo vadis?’
"Why has economics turned out this way?": A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics
Reclaiming the University - Transforming Economics as a Discipline
Reclaiming the university: Transforming economics as a discipline
'Why has economics turned out this way?' A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics (new version)
The incommensurability, incompatibility and incomparability of Keynes's and Walrasian economics
Minimum wages and the resilience of neoclassical labour market economics: Some preliminary evidence from Germany
Ludwik Fleck's Philosophy and Sociology of Science and the Resilience of Modern Neoclassical Economics - a Case Study
Pluralism in economics: Inquiries into a Daedalean concept
Comparing economic theories or: Pluralism in economics and the need for a comparative approach to scientific research programmes
Ideology and pluralism: A German view
Ideology and Pluralism in Economics: a German View
Editorial: Einführung in das Schwerpunktheft, Wirtschaftswissenschaft (en) – Quo vadis?’
"Why has economics turned out this way?": A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics
Reclaiming the University - Transforming Economics as a Discipline
Reclaiming the university: Transforming economics as a discipline
'Why has economics turned out this way?' A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics (new version)
The incommensurability, incompatibility and incomparability of Keynes's and Walrasian economics
Minimum wages and the resilience of neoclassical labour market economics: Some preliminary evidence from Germany
Ludwik Fleck's Philosophy and Sociology of Science and the Resilience of Modern Neoclassical Economics - a Case Study
Pluralism in economics: Inquiries into a Daedalean concept
Comparing economic theories or: Pluralism in economics and the need for a comparative approach to scientific research programmes
Ideology and pluralism: A German view
Ideology and Pluralism in Economics: a German View
Editorial: Einführung in das Schwerpunktheft, Wirtschaftswissenschaft (en) – Quo vadis?’
"Why has economics turned out this way?": A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics
Reclaiming the University - Transforming Economics as a Discipline
Reclaiming the university: Transforming economics as a discipline
'Why has economics turned out this way?' A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics (new version)
The incommensurability, incompatibility and incomparability of Keynes's and Walrasian economics
Minimum wages and the resilience of neoclassical labour market economics: Some preliminary evidence from Germany