Feedback GAP: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1748-5908
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Feedback GAP: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care ; volume:8 ; number:1 ; day:17 ; month:12 ; year:2013 ; pages:1-11 ; date:12.2013
Implementation science ; 8, Heft 1 (17.12.2013), 1-11, 12.2013
- Creator
-
Ivers, Noah M.
- Contributor
-
Tu, Karen
Young, Jacqueline
Francis, Jill J.
Barnsley, Jan
Shah, Baiju R.
Upshur, Ross E.
Moineddin, Rahim
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Zwarenstein, Merrick
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1748-5908-8-142
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016070923105
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 11:03 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Ivers, Noah M.
- Tu, Karen
- Young, Jacqueline
- Francis, Jill J.
- Barnsley, Jan
- Shah, Baiju R.
- Upshur, Ross E.
- Moineddin, Rahim
- Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
- Zwarenstein, Merrick
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Feedback GAP: study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care
Testing feedback message framing and comparators to address prescribing of high-risk medications in nursing homes: protocol for a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial
Engagement is a necessary condition to test audit and feedback design features: results of a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial with an embedded process evaluation
Delayed educational reminders for long-term medication adherence in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DERLA-STEMI): Protocol for a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial
Informing the research agenda for optimizing audit and feedback interventions: results of a prioritization exercise
Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses
No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Feedback GAP: study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care
Testing feedback message framing and comparators to address prescribing of high-risk medications in nursing homes: protocol for a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial
Engagement is a necessary condition to test audit and feedback design features: results of a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial with an embedded process evaluation
Delayed educational reminders for long-term medication adherence in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DERLA-STEMI): Protocol for a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial
Informing the research agenda for optimizing audit and feedback interventions: results of a prioritization exercise
Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses
No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Feedback GAP: study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care
Testing feedback message framing and comparators to address prescribing of high-risk medications in nursing homes: protocol for a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial
Engagement is a necessary condition to test audit and feedback design features: results of a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial with an embedded process evaluation
Delayed educational reminders for long-term medication adherence in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DERLA-STEMI): Protocol for a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial
Informing the research agenda for optimizing audit and feedback interventions: results of a prioritization exercise
Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses
No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?