Arbeitspapier

Does the Choice of Well-Being Measure Matter Empirically? An Illustration with German Data

We discuss and compare five measures of individual well-being, namely income, an objective composite well-being index, a measure of subjective well-being, equivalent income, and a well-being measure based on the von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities of the individuals. After examining the information requirements of these measures, we illustrate their implementation using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) for 2010. We find sizeable differences in the characteristics of the individuals identified as worst off according to the different well-being measures. Less than 1% of the individuals belong to the bottom decile according to all five measures. Moreover, the measures lead to considerably different well-being rankings of the individuals. These findings highlight the importance of the choice of well-being measure for policy making.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: IZA Discussion Papers ; No. 8589

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty: General
Thema
von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function
equivalent income
life satisfaction
composite well-being index
income
worst off
Germany

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Decancq, Koen
Neumann, Dirk
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
(wo)
Bonn
(wann)
2014

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
12.07.2024, 13:21 MESZ

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Decancq, Koen
  • Neumann, Dirk
  • Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)

Entstanden

  • 2014

Ähnliche Objekte (12)