Do shareholders vote strategically? Voting behavior, proposals screening, and majority rules
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Rationalitätskonzepte, Entscheidungsverhalten und ökonomische Modellierung (Laufzeit 1997 - 2008) ; 07-35
- Klassifikation
-
Politik
- Schlagwort
-
Aktionär
Wahlverhalten
Corporate Governance
Aktiengesellschaft
Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien
Hauptversammlung
Stimmrecht
USA ; Aktionär ; Wahlverhalten ; Corporate Governance ; Aktiengesellschaft ; Hauptversammlung ; Stimmrecht
USA
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Mannheim
- (wer)
-
Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim
- (wann)
-
2007
- Urheber
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:bsz:180-madoc-25339
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
25.03.2025, 13:43 MEZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Maug, Ernst
- Rydqvist, Kristian
- Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim
Entstanden
- 2007
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Majority Vote on Educational Standards
Majority Vote on Educational Standards
Majority voting leads to unanimity
The dark side of the vote: Biased voters, social information, and information aggregation through majority voting
The dark side of the vote: biased voters, social information, and information aggregation through majority voting
Strategic voting over strategic proposals
Does majority voting improve board accountability?
Why Should Majority Voting Be Unfair?
Does majority voting improve board accountability?
Majority Voting Rules as Behavior Toward Risk
Short-term Deviations from Simple Majority Voting
More EU Decisions by qualified majority voting - but how? Legal and political options for extending qualified majority voting
Majority Vote on Educational Standards
Majority Vote on Educational Standards
Majority voting leads to unanimity
The dark side of the vote: Biased voters, social information, and information aggregation through majority voting
The dark side of the vote: biased voters, social information, and information aggregation through majority voting
Strategic voting over strategic proposals
Does majority voting improve board accountability?
Why Should Majority Voting Be Unfair?
Does majority voting improve board accountability?
Majority Voting Rules as Behavior Toward Risk
Short-term Deviations from Simple Majority Voting
More EU Decisions by qualified majority voting - but how? Legal and political options for extending qualified majority voting
Majority Vote on Educational Standards
Majority Vote on Educational Standards
Majority voting leads to unanimity
The dark side of the vote: Biased voters, social information, and information aggregation through majority voting
The dark side of the vote: biased voters, social information, and information aggregation through majority voting
Strategic voting over strategic proposals
Does majority voting improve board accountability?
Why Should Majority Voting Be Unfair?
Does majority voting improve board accountability?
Majority Voting Rules as Behavior Toward Risk
Short-term Deviations from Simple Majority Voting