The Modal Argument against Nominal Description Theory

Abstract: The paper examines Loar's and Bach's defence of Nominal Description Theory against Kripkean Modal Argument (MA). Using formal tools of hyperintensional logic, I discriminate three kinds of nominal description which are possible substitutes for a proper name, thus considering various readings of the MA. On its natural understanding, the MA is valid { contrary to what Loar and Bach say. On the other hand, the soundness of the MA remains doubtful, as pointed out already by Loar and Bach

Location
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Extent
Online-Ressource
Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
The Modal Argument against Nominal Description Theory ; volume:31 ; number:1 ; year:2017 ; pages:76-100 ; extent:24
Kriterion ; 31, Heft 1 (2017), 76-100 (gesamt 24)

Creator
Raclavský, Jiří

DOI
10.1515/krt-2017-310106
URN
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022090315442100688852
Rights
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Last update
15.08.2025, 7:37 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Associated

  • Raclavský, Jiří

Other Objects (12)