The Modal Argument against Nominal Description Theory
Abstract: The paper examines Loar's and Bach's defence of Nominal Description Theory against Kripkean Modal Argument (MA). Using formal tools of hyperintensional logic, I discriminate three kinds of nominal description which are possible substitutes for a proper name, thus considering various readings of the MA. On its natural understanding, the MA is valid { contrary to what Loar and Bach say. On the other hand, the soundness of the MA remains doubtful, as pointed out already by Loar and Bach
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
The Modal Argument against Nominal Description Theory ; volume:31 ; number:1 ; year:2017 ; pages:76-100 ; extent:24
Kriterion ; 31, Heft 1 (2017), 76-100 (gesamt 24)
- Creator
-
Raclavský, Jiří
- DOI
-
10.1515/krt-2017-310106
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022090315442100688852
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:37 AM CEST
Data provider
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Raclavský, Jiří