- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1554-3528
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions ; day:17 ; month:4 ; year:2019 ; pages:1-19
Behavior research methods ; (17.4.2019), 1-19
- Creator
-
Elmer, Timon
Chaitanya, Krishna
Purwar, Prateek
Stadtfeld, Christoph
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.3758/s13428-018-1180-y
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2019051123012955558873
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:52 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Elmer, Timon
- Chaitanya, Krishna
- Purwar, Prateek
- Stadtfeld, Christoph
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Interviewer-related measurement error in face-to-face surveys
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Interviewer-related measurement error in face-to-face surveys
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction