Two Ethical Hurdles Facing the Osterloh-Frey Proposal

Abstract: The proposal that Europe should sell the right to immigration to reflect the access to public goods raises two ethical objections. One draws on the proposition of Michael Sandel that there are things that ‘money can’t buy’. Public goods are the result of a reciprocal exchange of obligations within a community.As such, they are not transactions in a market and putting a price on them can inadvertently weaken their essentially moral nature. The other objection is that selling the right to immigrate would enable the elites of poor countries to exit their obligations to those left behind in their own societies. While potentially damaging poor societies by removing their most able people, it would create the comfortable illusion in Europe that we were being more generous to people from poor countries.

Object Details

• Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
• Extent: Online-Ressource
• Language: Englisch

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: Two Ethical Hurdles Facing the Osterloh-Frey Proposal ; volume:40 ; number:2 ; year:2018 ; pages:227-234 ; extent:8 ; Analyse & Kritik ; 40, Heft 2 (2018), 227-234 (gesamt 8)

Contributors, Places and Time

• Creator: Collier, Paul

Further information

• DOI: 10.1515/auk-2018-0011
• URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-2023120713032176602468
• Rights: Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
• Last update: 15.08.2025, 7:26 AM CEST