Scholars (Not) Investigating Srebrenica. Academic Feuds and Other Shortcomings
Abstract: Fifteen years after the publication of the Srebrenica report by the Netherlands Institute for War Documentation (NIOD), the Srebrenica genocide has not become subject of more scholarly and historical research. On the contrary, academics prefer to keep their hands off the topic, confining themselves to ‘theoretical’, ‘reflexive’, or ‘moralistic’ reflections on the work done by the NIOD team. Symptomatic of the current state of inertia and diminishing professional standards is the recent book by the Dutch historian and psychologist Eelco Runia in which he attacks the NIOD report from a psychoanalytic standpoint.
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Scholars (Not) Investigating Srebrenica. Academic Feuds and Other Shortcomings ; volume:65 ; number:3 ; year:2017 ; pages:589-595 ; extent:7
Comparative Southeast European studies ; 65, Heft 3 (2017), 589-595 (gesamt 7)
- Creator
-
Duijzings, Ger
- DOI
-
10.1515/soeu-2017-0036
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2404301546510.492670992232
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:55 AM CEST
Data provider
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Duijzings, Ger