Scholars (Not) Investigating Srebrenica. Academic Feuds and Other Shortcomings

Abstract: Fifteen years after the publication of the Srebrenica report by the Netherlands Institute for War Documentation (NIOD), the Srebrenica genocide has not become subject of more scholarly and historical research. On the contrary, academics prefer to keep their hands off the topic, confining themselves to ‘theoretical’, ‘reflexive’, or ‘moralistic’ reflections on the work done by the NIOD team. Symptomatic of the current state of inertia and diminishing professional standards is the recent book by the Dutch historian and psychologist Eelco Runia in which he attacks the NIOD report from a psychoanalytic standpoint.

Location
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Extent
Online-Ressource
Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Scholars (Not) Investigating Srebrenica. Academic Feuds and Other Shortcomings ; volume:65 ; number:3 ; year:2017 ; pages:589-595 ; extent:7
Comparative Southeast European studies ; 65, Heft 3 (2017), 589-595 (gesamt 7)

Creator
Duijzings, Ger

DOI
10.1515/soeu-2017-0036
URN
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2404301546510.492670992232
Rights
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Last update
14.08.2025, 10:55 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Associated

  • Duijzings, Ger

Other Objects (12)