Bericht
The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, investor-state dispute settlement and China
This Perspective argues that since China has been a strong proponent of investment arbitration for more than a decade, Beijing is likely to favor the mechanism in a future EU-China deal – irrespective of whether it is included in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership agreement.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: Columbia FDI Perspectives ; No. 140
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Berger, Axel
Skovgaard Poulsen, Lauge N.
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)
- (where)
-
New York, NY
- (when)
-
2015
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:41 AM CET
Data provider
This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Bericht
Associated
- Berger, Axel
- Skovgaard Poulsen, Lauge N.
- Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)
Time of origin
- 2015
Other Objects (12)
Demystifying Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
Germany, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and investment-dispute settlement: Observations on a paradox
Using investor-state dispute settlement to enforce investor obligations
Investor-state dispute settlement: A government's dilemma
Investor-state vs. state-state dispute settlement
Closing Doors to Investor-State Dispute Settlement
An optimal investor-state dispute settlement mechanism
Investor-State Dispute Settlement and Multinational Firm Behavior
Investor‐state dispute settlement and multinational firm behavior
Investor-state dispute settlement – Pulling the chain tighter
Materializing corporate social responsibility in investor-state dispute settlement
Settlement of investor-state disputes: Can states avoid arbitration?
Demystifying Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
Germany, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and investment-dispute settlement: Observations on a paradox
Using investor-state dispute settlement to enforce investor obligations
Investor-state dispute settlement: A government's dilemma
Investor-state vs. state-state dispute settlement
Closing Doors to Investor-State Dispute Settlement
An optimal investor-state dispute settlement mechanism
Investor-State Dispute Settlement and Multinational Firm Behavior
Investor‐state dispute settlement and multinational firm behavior
Investor-state dispute settlement – Pulling the chain tighter
Materializing corporate social responsibility in investor-state dispute settlement
Settlement of investor-state disputes: Can states avoid arbitration?
Demystifying Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
Germany, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and investment-dispute settlement: Observations on a paradox
Using investor-state dispute settlement to enforce investor obligations
Investor-state dispute settlement: A government's dilemma
Investor-state vs. state-state dispute settlement
Closing Doors to Investor-State Dispute Settlement
An optimal investor-state dispute settlement mechanism
Investor-State Dispute Settlement and Multinational Firm Behavior
Investor‐state dispute settlement and multinational firm behavior
Investor-state dispute settlement – Pulling the chain tighter
Materializing corporate social responsibility in investor-state dispute settlement