Evaluation of bias and precision in methods of analysis for pragmatic trials with missing outcome data: a simulation study
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1745-6215
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Evaluation of bias and precision in methods of analysis for pragmatic trials with missing outcome data: a simulation study ; volume:14 ; number:1 ; day:29 ; month:11 ; year:2013 ; pages:1 ; date:11.2013
Trials ; 14, Heft 1 (29.11.2013), 1, 11.2013
- Creator
-
Joseph, Royes
- Contributor
-
Sim, Julius
Ogollah, Reuben
Lewis, Martyn
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1745-6215-14-S1-P110
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016050234470
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:50 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Joseph, Royes
- Sim, Julius
- Ogollah, Reuben
- Lewis, Martyn
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Addressing identification bias in the design and analysis of cluster-randomized pragmatic trials: a case study
Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?
Negative spillover due to constraints on care delivery: a potential source of bias in pragmatic clinical trials
Bias and precision in early phase adaptive oncology studies and its consequences for confirmatory trials
Missing call bias in high-throughput genotyping
Pragmatic trials and implementation science: grounds for divorce?
Irregular assessment times in pragmatic randomized clinical trials
Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management
Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability
Impact of missing data on bias and precision when estimating change in patient-reported outcomes from a clinical registry
Working with population totals in the presence of missing data comparing imputation methods in terms of bias and precision
Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials
Addressing identification bias in the design and analysis of cluster-randomized pragmatic trials: a case study
Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?
Negative spillover due to constraints on care delivery: a potential source of bias in pragmatic clinical trials
Bias and precision in early phase adaptive oncology studies and its consequences for confirmatory trials
Missing call bias in high-throughput genotyping
Pragmatic trials and implementation science: grounds for divorce?
Irregular assessment times in pragmatic randomized clinical trials
Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management
Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability
Impact of missing data on bias and precision when estimating change in patient-reported outcomes from a clinical registry
Working with population totals in the presence of missing data comparing imputation methods in terms of bias and precision
Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials
Addressing identification bias in the design and analysis of cluster-randomized pragmatic trials: a case study
Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?
Negative spillover due to constraints on care delivery: a potential source of bias in pragmatic clinical trials
Bias and precision in early phase adaptive oncology studies and its consequences for confirmatory trials
Missing call bias in high-throughput genotyping
Pragmatic trials and implementation science: grounds for divorce?
Irregular assessment times in pragmatic randomized clinical trials
Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management
Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability
Impact of missing data on bias and precision when estimating change in patient-reported outcomes from a clinical registry
Working with population totals in the presence of missing data comparing imputation methods in terms of bias and precision