Nasal breathing is superior to oral breathing when performing and undergoing transnasal endoscopy: a randomized trial
Abstract: Background Transnasal endoscopy presents a technical difficulty when inserting the flexible endoscope. It is unclear whether a particular breathing method is useful for transnasal endoscopy. Therefore, we conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare endoscopic operability and patient tolerance between patients assigned to nasal breathing or oral breathing groups. Methods 198 eligible patients were randomly assigned to undergo transnasal endoscopy with nasal breathing or with oral breathing. Endoscopists and patients answered questionnaires on the endoscopic operability and patient tolerance using a 100-mm visual analog scale ranging from 0 (non-existent) to 100 (most difficult/unbearable). The visibility of the upper-middle pharynx was recorded. Results Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. Nasal breathing showed a higher rate of good visibility of the upper-middle pharynx than oral breathing (91.9 % vs. 27.6 %; P < 0.001). Nasal breathing showed lower mean [SD] scores than oral breathing in terms of overall technical difficulty (21.0 [11.4] vs. 35.4 [15.0]; P < 0.001). Regarding patient tolerance, nasal breathing showed lower scores than oral breathing for overall discomfort (22.1 [18.8] vs. 30.5 [20.9]; P = 0.004) and other symptoms, including nasal and throat pain, choking, suffocating, gagging, belching, and bloating (all P < 0.05). The pharyngeal bleeding rate was lower in the nasal breathing group than in the oral breathing group (0 % vs. 9.2 %; P = 0.002). Conclusions Nasal breathing is superior to oral breathing for those performing and undergoing transnasal endoscopy. Nasal breathing led to good visibility of the upper-middle pharynx, improved endoscopic operability, and better patient tolerance, and was safer owing to decreased pharyngeal bleeding.
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Nasal breathing is superior to oral breathing when performing and undergoing transnasal endoscopy: a randomized trial ; day:16 ; month:09 ; year:2022
Endoscopy ; (16.09.2022)
- Contributor
-
Takahashi, Keitaro
Murakami, Yuki
Sasaki, Takahiro
Ueno, Nobuhiro
Tachibana, Shion
Ikeda, Junpei
Ishigaki, Kenichi
Horiuchi, Masashi
Yoshida, Moe
Uehara, Kyoko
Kobayashi, Yu
Sugiyama, Yuya
Kunogi, Takehito
Muto, Mizue
Ando, Katsuyoshi
Muto, Momotaro
Kashima, Shin
Moriichi, Kentaro
Tanabe, Hiroki
Yanagawa, Nobuyuki
Harada, Kazumichi
Teramoto, Takashi
Okumura, Toshikatsu
Fujiya, Mikihiro
- DOI
-
10.1055/a-1900-6004
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022112411475925525716
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:30 AM CEST
Data provider
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Takahashi, Keitaro
- Murakami, Yuki
- Sasaki, Takahiro
- Ueno, Nobuhiro
- Tachibana, Shion
- Ikeda, Junpei
- Ishigaki, Kenichi
- Horiuchi, Masashi
- Yoshida, Moe
- Uehara, Kyoko
- Kobayashi, Yu
- Sugiyama, Yuya
- Kunogi, Takehito
- Muto, Mizue
- Ando, Katsuyoshi
- Muto, Momotaro
- Kashima, Shin
- Moriichi, Kentaro
- Tanabe, Hiroki
- Yanagawa, Nobuyuki
- Harada, Kazumichi
- Teramoto, Takashi
- Okumura, Toshikatsu
- Fujiya, Mikihiro