Comparing the impact on the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction critical patients of using midazolam, propofol, and dexmedetomidine for sedation
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2261
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Comparing the impact on the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction critical patients of using midazolam, propofol, and dexmedetomidine for sedation ; volume:21 ; number:1 ; day:7 ; month:12 ; year:2021 ; pages:1-8 ; date:12.2021
BMC cardiovascular disorders ; 21, Heft 1 (7.12.2021), 1-8, 12.2021
- Creator
-
Jiang, Xiaowei
Yan, Min
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12872-021-02385-9
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022020919343534043032
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:36 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Jiang, Xiaowei
- Yan, Min
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Dexmedetomidine versus standard care sedation with propofol or midazolam in intensive care: an economic evaluation
Dexmedetomidine/propofol versus dexmedetomidine/ketamine versus dexmedetomidine as a sole agent for pediatric sedation during MRI
Electrophysiological differences of randomized deep sedation with dexmedetomidine versus propofol
Combined sedation with midazolam/propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients
Propofol versus pethidine/midazolam sedation: benefits in flexible upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
Dexmedetomidine versus propofol sedation in flexible bronchoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam sedation for autistic children undergoing electroencephalogram: a prospective randomized trial
Dexmedetomidine versus propofol for sedation in stereotactic brain biopsy: a comparative study
Oral midazolam vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine plus oral midazolam for sedation of pediatric outpatients: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
Intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine association allows shorter induction time for pediatric sedation compared to intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam
The effect of age on outpatient pediatric procedural sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam
Pharmacodynamic modeling of moderate sedation and rationale for dosing using midazolam, propofol and alfentanil
Dexmedetomidine versus standard care sedation with propofol or midazolam in intensive care: an economic evaluation
Dexmedetomidine/propofol versus dexmedetomidine/ketamine versus dexmedetomidine as a sole agent for pediatric sedation during MRI
Electrophysiological differences of randomized deep sedation with dexmedetomidine versus propofol
Combined sedation with midazolam/propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients
Propofol versus pethidine/midazolam sedation: benefits in flexible upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
Dexmedetomidine versus propofol sedation in flexible bronchoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam sedation for autistic children undergoing electroencephalogram: a prospective randomized trial
Dexmedetomidine versus propofol for sedation in stereotactic brain biopsy: a comparative study
Oral midazolam vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine plus oral midazolam for sedation of pediatric outpatients: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
Intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine association allows shorter induction time for pediatric sedation compared to intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam
The effect of age on outpatient pediatric procedural sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam
Pharmacodynamic modeling of moderate sedation and rationale for dosing using midazolam, propofol and alfentanil
Dexmedetomidine versus standard care sedation with propofol or midazolam in intensive care: an economic evaluation
Dexmedetomidine/propofol versus dexmedetomidine/ketamine versus dexmedetomidine as a sole agent for pediatric sedation during MRI
Electrophysiological differences of randomized deep sedation with dexmedetomidine versus propofol
Combined sedation with midazolam/propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients
Propofol versus pethidine/midazolam sedation: benefits in flexible upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
Dexmedetomidine versus propofol sedation in flexible bronchoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam sedation for autistic children undergoing electroencephalogram: a prospective randomized trial
Dexmedetomidine versus propofol for sedation in stereotactic brain biopsy: a comparative study
Oral midazolam vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine plus oral midazolam for sedation of pediatric outpatients: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
Intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine association allows shorter induction time for pediatric sedation compared to intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam
The effect of age on outpatient pediatric procedural sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam