Why have “revolutionary” tools found purchase in memory science?

Abstract: The study of the neural basis of memory has advanced over the past decade. A key contributor to this memory “renaissance” has been new tools. On its face, this matches what might be described as a neuroscientific revolution stemming from the development of tools, where this revolution is largely independent of theory. In this paper, we challenge this tool revolution account by focusing on a problem that arises in applying it to this “renaissance”: it is centered around memory, but the tools were not developed for solving problems in memory science. To resolve this problem, we introduce an account that distinguishes tool development and tool uptake, and we argue that while theoretical considerations may not inform development, they do inform uptake. Acknowledging the distance between these stages of tool use draws our attention to the questions of why and how tool uptake occurs in the domains that it does. https://philosophymindscience.org/index.php/phimisci/article/view/10499

Objekt anzeigen

• Standort: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
• Umfang: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: Englisch

Verweise und Beziehungen

• Erschienen in: Why have “revolutionary” tools found purchase in memory science? ; volume:4 ; year:2023 ; Philosophy and the mind sciences ; 4 (2023)

Beteiligte, Orts- und Zeitangaben

• Urheber: Colaço, David ; Robins, Sarah

Weitere Informationen

• DOI: 10.33735/phimisci.2023.10499
• URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-2023122717565918644337
• Rechteinformation: Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.