The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders

to related objects

Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main

ISSN: 1745-6215

Extent: Online-Ressource

Language: Englisch

Notes: online resource.

Bibliographic citation: The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders ; volume:20 ; number:1 ; day:23 ; month:12 ; year:2019 ; pages:1-16 ; date:12.2019
Trials ; 20, Heft 1 (23.12.2019), 1-16, 12.2019

Creator: Nicholls, Stuart G.
Carroll, Kelly
Zwarenstein, Merrick
Brehaut, Jamie C.
Weijer, Charles
Hey, Spencer P.
Goldstein, Cory E.
Graham, Ian D.
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
McKenzie, Joanne E.
Fergusson, Dean A.
Taljaard, Monica

Contributor: SpringerLink (Online service)

DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3899-x

URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-2020032712171523914415

Rights: Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.

Last update: 14.08.2025, 10:53 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Show original at data provider

Associated

Nicholls, Stuart G.
Carroll, Kelly
Zwarenstein, Merrick
Brehaut, Jamie C.
Weijer, Charles
Hey, Spencer P.
Goldstein, Cory E.
Graham, Ian D.
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
McKenzie, Joanne E.
Fergusson, Dean A.
Taljaard, Monica
SpringerLink (Online service)

Other Objects (12)

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol

Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation

AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol

Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation

AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol

Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation

AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis

Cultural heritage institutions wishing to register will find more information here.

Fields marked * need to be filled in.

Username*

Please enter your username

Email*

Please enter your email address

Please do not fill this field

First name

Last name

Password*

Please enter your password

Confirm password*

Please enter the same password

I have read the terms of use and the privacy policy for the collection of personal data and accept them. *

This field is required.

I would like to subscribe to the newsletter of the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek. See newsletter subscription info.

Account created

Your "My DDB" account has been successfully created. Before you can log in to your account, you must click the confirmation link in the message we just sent to the email address you provided.

The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders

Object Details

References and Relationships

Contributors, Places and Time

Further information

Data provider

Associated

Other Objects (12)

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol

Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation

AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol

Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation

AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol

Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation

AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis

Related objects

Reset password