The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1745-6215
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders ; volume:20 ; number:1 ; day:23 ; month:12 ; year:2019 ; pages:1-16 ; date:12.2019
Trials ; 20, Heft 1 (23.12.2019), 1-16, 12.2019
- Urheber
-
Nicholls, Stuart G.
Carroll, Kelly
Zwarenstein, Merrick
Brehaut, Jamie C.
Weijer, Charles
Hey, Spencer P.
Goldstein, Cory E.
Graham, Ian D.
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
McKenzie, Joanne E.
Fergusson, Dean A.
Taljaard, Monica
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13063-019-3899-x
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2020032712171523914415
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:53 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Nicholls, Stuart G.
- Carroll, Kelly
- Zwarenstein, Merrick
- Brehaut, Jamie C.
- Weijer, Charles
- Hey, Spencer P.
- Goldstein, Cory E.
- Graham, Ian D.
- Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
- McKenzie, Joanne E.
- Fergusson, Dean A.
- Taljaard, Monica
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies