Journal article | Zeitschriftenartikel

A constructive/ist response to Glaser's "Constructivist Grounded Theory?"

"Recent articles on the Grounded Theory Method (GTM) have started to analyze its conceptual and philosophical foundations. In particular it has been argued that the early characterizations by GLASER and STRAUSS exhibit a scientistic and positivist orientation that is no longer tenable. In her recent contribution to the GTM literature, CHARMAZ distinguished between objectivist GTM and constructivist GTM. This drew a response from Barney GLASER. What follows is a rejoinder to GLASER, offering some clarification of developments in people's understanding of this important and widely-used qualitative approach." (author's abstract)

A constructive/ist response to Glaser's "Constructivist Grounded Theory?"

Urheber*in: Bryant, Antony

Attribution 4.0 International

0
/
0

ISSN
0936-6784
Extent
Seite(n): 106-113
Language
Englisch
Notes
Status: Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)

Bibliographic citation
Historical Social Research, Supplement(19)

Subject
Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie
Forschungsarten der Sozialforschung
Grounded Theory
Forschungsansatz
qualitative Methode
Konstruktivismus

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Bryant, Antony
Event
Veröffentlichung
(where)
Deutschland
(when)
2007

URN
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-288280
Rights
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln
Last update
21.06.2024, 4:27 PM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Zeitschriftenartikel

Associated

  • Bryant, Antony

Time of origin

  • 2007

Other Objects (12)