Effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among adults: an overview of systematic reviews
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
1 Online-Ressource.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among adults: an overview of systematic reviews ; volume:13 ; number:1 ; day:12 ; month:7 ; year:2024 ; pages:1-33 ; date:12.2024
Systematic Reviews ; 13, Heft 1 (12.7.2024), 1-33, 12.2024
- Urheber
-
Hersi, Mona
Beck, Andrew
Hamel, Candyce
Esmaeilisaraji, Leila
Pussegoda, Kusala
Austin, Bradley
Ahmadzai, Nadera
Pratt, Misty
Thuku, Micere
Yazdi, Fatemeh
Bennett, Alexandria
Shaver, Nicole
Vyas, Niyati
Skidmore, Becky
Hutton, Brian
Manuel, Douglas
Morrow, Matt
Pakhale, Smita
Presseau, Justin
Shea, Beverley J.
Little, Julian
Moher, David
Stevens, Adrienne
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13643-024-02570-9
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2409292110272.436951671038
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.08.2025, 07:36 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Hersi, Mona
- Beck, Andrew
- Hamel, Candyce
- Esmaeilisaraji, Leila
- Pussegoda, Kusala
- Austin, Bradley
- Ahmadzai, Nadera
- Pratt, Misty
- Thuku, Micere
- Yazdi, Fatemeh
- Bennett, Alexandria
- Shaver, Nicole
- Vyas, Niyati
- Skidmore, Becky
- Hutton, Brian
- Manuel, Douglas
- Morrow, Matt
- Pakhale, Smita
- Presseau, Justin
- Shea, Beverley J.
- Little, Julian
- Moher, David
- Stevens, Adrienne
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2015
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Erratum to: Thanks to all those who reviewed for systematic reviews in 2014
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature