Artikel

Point at, nudge, or push private provision of a public good?

How decision makers respond to behavioral and traditional interventions might depend on their and the regulator's attributes. This online experiment investigates the effect of defaults, recommendations, and mandatory minimum contributions accompanied by regulator information on the private provision of climate protection, accounting for intrinsic motivation. Findings show that all interventions increase the propensity of individuals to choose the focal value. There is no evidence that recommendations and defaults change average contributions. We report a negative interaction of the default with intrinsic motivation. Expert or political regulator information decreases intervention effectiveness. The study improves our understanding of behavioral public policy instruments.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Journal: Economic Inquiry ; ISSN: 1465-7295 ; Volume: 59 ; Year: 2021 ; Issue: 3 ; Pages: 996-1007 ; Boston, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Classification
Wirtschaft
Subject
climate protection
default
experiment
motivation crowding
nudge
public good

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Bruns, Hendrik
Perino, Grischa
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
(where)
Boston, USA
(when)
2021

DOI
doi:10.1111/ecin.12981
Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:41 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Artikel

Associated

  • Bruns, Hendrik
  • Perino, Grischa
  • Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Time of origin

  • 2021

Other Objects (12)