Testing feedback message framing and comparators to address prescribing of high-risk medications in nursing homes: protocol for a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1748-5908
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Testing feedback message framing and comparators to address prescribing of high-risk medications in nursing homes: protocol for a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial ; volume:12 ; number:1 ; day:14 ; month:7 ; year:2017 ; pages:1-11 ; date:12.2017
Implementation science ; 12, Heft 1 (14.7.2017), 1-11, 12.2017
- Classification
-
Medizin, Gesundheit
- Creator
-
Ivers, Noah M.
- Contributor
-
Desveaux, Laura
Presseau, Justin
Reis, Catherine
Witteman, Holly O.
Taljaard, Monica K.
McCleary, Nicola
Thavorn, Kednapa
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13012-017-0615-7
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201708031262
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:24 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Ivers, Noah M.
- Desveaux, Laura
- Presseau, Justin
- Reis, Catherine
- Witteman, Holly O.
- Taljaard, Monica K.
- McCleary, Nicola
- Thavorn, Kednapa
- Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Delayed educational reminders for long-term medication adherence in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DERLA-STEMI): Protocol for a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial
Engagement is a necessary condition to test audit and feedback design features: results of a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial with an embedded process evaluation
Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
What is the role of randomised trials in implementation science?
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Delayed educational reminders for long-term medication adherence in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DERLA-STEMI): Protocol for a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial
Engagement is a necessary condition to test audit and feedback design features: results of a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial with an embedded process evaluation
Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies
What is the role of randomised trials in implementation science?
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Delayed educational reminders for long-term medication adherence in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DERLA-STEMI): Protocol for a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial
Engagement is a necessary condition to test audit and feedback design features: results of a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial with an embedded process evaluation
Changing behaviour ‘more or less’—do theories of behaviour inform strategies for implementation and de-implementation? A critical interpretive synthesis
AIMD - a validated, simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies